INDUSTRY SOLUTIONS / FORENSIC LABORATORIES
More connected methods. More visible evidence.
Bring complementary signature, handwriting, document and media workflows into a consistent examination process. Explore method inputs and outputs, compare independent signals and retain the processing context of derived exhibits.
YOUR INVESTIGATION CONTEXT
Forensic laboratories.
A focused evidence workflow.
Laboratory work benefits from clearly defined questions, consistent inputs and visible method scope. Admissible Lab connects quantitative comparison, diagnostic maps and non-generative clarification with documentation of the material used.
01 / START WITH THE ISSUE
Practical pathways
for your team.
Connect each evidence question to a dedicated solution and the right supporting module.
Independent writing comparisons
Combine multi-reference signatures, handwriting authorship comparison and quantified writing features.
Signatures & handwriting solutionImage & source investigation
Investigate duplication, provenance and camera or encoding characteristics with suitable references.
Image authenticity solutionReproducible clarification
Create working copies using recorded operations while retaining the original material.
Evidence presentation solution02 / CONNECTED EXAMINATION
Keep the question
and the source connected.
Original material, specific methods and understandable outputs form the foundation of a useful evidence record.
- 01
Select a method with suitable input and validation scope.
- 02
Compare complementary outputs against the evidence question.
- 03
Retain references, settings and source-linked results.
03 / BEFORE YOU START
Practical answers.
Clearer requirements.
Are all comparison outputs calibrated likelihood ratios?
No. Depending on the workflow, outputs include descriptive similarity, raw distance, raw camera or voice scores, diagnostic maps, or calibrated comparison measures. The module pages describe those distinctions.
Where can method scope and validation be reviewed?
The module pages list input requirements and outputs. Research and validation resources describe available evidence and implementation-specific limitations without treating benchmark results as a universal casework guarantee.
YOUR NEXT INVESTIGATION
Start with the question.
See what is possible.
Explore the workflows with your evidence requirements in mind.