Across your evidenceCompare characteristicsTrace inconsistenciesClarify captured detailConnect source & output
01 / CHOOSE YOUR QUESTION
One question. A focused way forward.
Explore a pathway, see what you need and discover the tools that fit. Each solution connects the investigative purpose to a practical workflow.
01 / SOLUTION PATHWAY
Turn a disputed signature into a structured comparison.
Bring questioned signatures, independent references and handwriting evidence into one connected examination. Compare visible characteristics, quantify writing features and keep every output linked to its source.
Extract signature candidates from a document or start with an image. Keep questioned material separate from independently sourced known samples.
02
Compare more than one signal
Use multiple reference signatures, visual comparison and handwriting measurements to examine agreement and differences across the evidence.
03
Build the evidence record
Bring comparison outputs, reference information and linked crops into the reporting workflow, with the source and selected method retained.
Evidence requirements & output scope +
A visual similarity measurement describes resemblance; it is not an authenticity verdict. Timing and pressure require real capture data and cannot be recovered from a scanned signature.
02 / SOLUTION PATHWAY
Look beyond the surface of a document.
Connect file history, signature regions and physical security features in a document examination workflow. Start with the original file or a purpose-made photograph, then select the tools that fit the evidence.
What does the file, page or capture reveal about a questioned document?
THE EVIDENCE
Original JPEG, TIFF or PDF for metadata; document page images for extraction; dedicated lighting for physical features.
THE OUTPUT
Extracted metadata, linked signature crops and enhanced physical features.
01
Choose the right capture
Use an original digital file for embedded metadata. For physical features, prepare raking-light or transmitted-light photographs instead of a general scan.
02
Inspect targeted features
Extract linked signature regions, inspect timestamps and editing traces, or reveal indentation and watermark signals from suitable captures.
03
Connect page and finding
Keep crops linked to their page and carry metadata, enhanced copies and selected examination outputs into the evidence record.
Evidence requirements & output scope +
Metadata can be absent or edited. Indentation needs raking light; watermark enhancement needs transmitted light. Printer-source decoding needs an eligible colour-laser print and a scan of at least 300 dpi. This workflow does not date paper or ink.
03 / SOLUTION PATHWAY
Follow the traces behind an image.
Investigate suspected duplication, compression history, file structure and provenance with complementary image-forensics tools. Move from a specific question to a targeted visual exhibit, with the source file kept separate from derived outputs.
Does the image contain a duplication, provenance record or inconsistent image signal?
THE EVIDENCE
The original image, suitable native-resolution references where required, and a defined region or question.
THE OUTPUT
Region maps, duplication correspondences, provenance checks and diagnostic measurements.
01
Preserve the source file
Work from the original image where possible. Screenshots and social-media re-encoding can remove metadata, provenance and compression signals.
02
Triangulate the question
Combine duplication search, compression diagnostics, local image statistics or content-credential checks according to the suspected issue.
03
Make the signal visible
Inspect mapped regions and correspondence points alongside file-level outputs. Create a separate non-generative viewing copy when noise obscures the image.
Evidence requirements & output scope +
Compression-based workflows require a suitable JPEG. Sensor comparison requires at least eight appropriate reference frames and has limited validation. Missing provenance is inconclusive, and a diagnostic map is not a tampering verdict.
04 / SOLUTION PATHWAY
Separate what was recorded from what is assumed.
Bring confidence-marked transcription, recording comparison and edit-point screening into a connected audio examination. Produce clearer listening copies while preserving the original recording as the transcription source.
What was said, do recordings share content, and where might the recording change?
THE EVIDENCE
Original audio or supported video with audio. A known recording is required for voice comparison or shared-content comparison.
THE OUTPUT
Confidence-marked text, comparison scores, continuity traces and listening copies.
01
Start with the original
Retain the original recording and its container information. Extract audio from supported video when needed without replacing the source evidence.
02
Answer distinct audio questions
Transcribe speech, compare voices, compare recorded content or inspect continuity and environment changes with the corresponding workflow.
03
Prepare a clearer exhibit
Create a separate listening copy with conditional hum removal, noise reduction and level control. Keep the original as the transcript source.
Evidence requirements & output scope +
Voice comparison reports raw similarity, not a calibrated identity conclusion. Hum continuity needs a detectable mains trace and does not establish an absolute recording date or time. Transcription is performed on the original recording.
05 / SOLUTION PATHWAY
See the sequence. Question the timeline.
Explore video integrity, frame timing, multi-camera alignment and calibrated measurements with connected file and content workflows. Distinguish whole-file checks from sampled screening and keep enhanced copies tied to their sources.
Are the frames, timing, source characteristics and scene measurements consistent?
THE EVIDENCE
Original video files; timing anchors, scene calibration or same-mode camera references for workflows that need them.
THE OUTPUT
Frame and timestamp records, sampled indicators, synchronisation offsets and calibrated measurements.
01
Understand the recording
Read container and stream metadata, inspect structure and establish the file’s frame and timing properties before choosing a content-level check.
02
Connect time and scene
Inspect duplicate frames, activity or sampled manipulation signals. Align camera recordings using anchors and use appropriate calibration for scene measurements.
03
Prepare reproducible outputs
Create verified stream-copy conversions or non-generative viewing copies, keeping source identifiers and processing history linked to the outputs.
Evidence requirements & output scope +
Sampled checks do not examine every frame. Timing and measurement workflows require suitable source timing, calibration and uncertainty. Face-swap screening covers one indicator family; it is not a universal deepfake verification.
06 / SOLUTION PATHWAY
Make the evidence easier to examine.
Create clearer viewing and listening copies, connect findings to source material and assemble understandable technical outputs. Use captured information and recorded processing steps to make complex evidence easier to communicate.
How can captured evidence be clarified and presented with a traceable processing record?
THE EVIDENCE
Original images, audio or video; a defined viewing or listening goal; calibration where measurements are included.
THE OUTPUT
Separate working copies, documented transformations and source-linked report material.
01
Define the viewing task
Identify whether noise, uneven level or poor contrast is making a relevant feature difficult to inspect. Keep the source file unchanged.
02
Apply targeted clarification
Use image denoising, conditional audio enhancement or aligned video-frame bursts and contrast adjustments suited to the source.
03
Connect output to source
Retain original and derived material as distinct items, with processing history and selected outputs carried into the reporting workflow.
Evidence requirements & output scope +
Enhancement does not recover information that was never captured. Working copies are separate from originals. Use the original recording for forensic transcription and appropriate source material for timing or measurement.
02 / BUILT FOR YOUR CONTEXT
Your sector. Your evidence questions.
From a disputed agreement to a multi-camera timeline, explore how the same connected capabilities fit different professional settings.
01 / INDUSTRY
Law enforcement
Bring disputed documents, photographs, audio and CCTV into focused examination pathways. Admissible Lab connects targeted file analysis with measurable outputs and a source-linked evidence workflow.
Examine documentary and recorded material in administrative, regulatory and public-sector investigations. Connect a specific evidence question to a defined method, required input and understandable output.
Explore the basis of disputed signatures, documents and recorded media with structured comparisons and source-linked outputs. Connect the issue in dispute to the evidence needed for a meaningful technical examination.
Bring complementary signature, handwriting, document and media workflows into a consistent examination process. Explore method inputs and outputs, compare independent signals and retain the processing context of derived exhibits.
Examine disputed commercial records, submitted images and recordings in authorised internal investigations. Move from a specific concern to targeted evidence analysis without treating every file anomaly as proof of wrongdoing.
Connect signature comparison, document checks and image investigation in claims or financial-services enquiries. Focus on measurable characteristics and source material when a record or submitted media item is questioned.
