Signatures & documents
Identify questioned and reference specimens. Label crops, measured features and document regions so each comparison can be revisited.
Explore signature analysis ↗REPORTING / CLARITY THAT CAN BE EXAMINED
Make every
finding traceable.
Connect source evidence, methods, measurements, processing history and visual exhibits in a structured forensic reporting workflow.
Build a report that shows what was measured, how it was assessed and where the limits lie. Give reviewers a path back to the source.
Clear observations. Reviewable exhibits. Qualified conclusions.
ADMISSIBLE LAB FORENSICS
REPORT STRUCTURE / 01
From observation
to interpretation.
01
Document the evidence
Source identity · reference material · method
02
Show the observation
Illustrative signal · no case data
03
Explain the interpretation
Competing explanations · limitations · review
RESULT DOCUMENTATIONRequired before release
A reporting framework, not a generated case report.
01 / REPORT ANATOMY
A clear record.
Three distinct layers.
Explore the record structure, from source material and method parameters to observations and result documentation.
ESTABLISH THE FOUNDATION
The question comes first.
Identify the instruction, permitted scope, examiner and specimen inventory. Describe acquisition context and distinguish native sources from scans, exports and other derivatives.
Read the input preparation guide →- Source record
- Specimen ID, provenance, file identity and reference selection.
- Method record
- User-facing analysis, implementation version, settings and preprocessing.
- Suitability record
- Input quality, capture conditions and the relevant validation scope.
MAKE THE OBSERVATION INSPECTABLE
Let the exhibit show its source.
Connect each crop, waveform, frame, map or measurement table to a specimen and a region or time interval. Retain units, legends and the processing history.
Understand the different output types →- Measurements
- State the metric and units; keep similarity distinct from probability.
- Exhibit references
- Identify source, location, interval, sampling and transformations.
- Working copies
- Label enhancement and retain the unchanged original for comparison.
DOCUMENT THE REASONING
Results linked to the evidence.
Record competing explanations, contradictory signals, supported observations and remaining uncertainty.
Review method validation and limits →- Interpretation
- Distinguish the observed result from the inference drawn from it.
- Limitations
- Record quality constraints, missing references and unresolved questions.
- Release record
- Identify the responsible examiner, review date and authorised conclusion.
02 / EXHIBITS WITH CONTEXT
Different evidence.
The same discipline.
Choose exhibits that make the examination understandable while preserving the relationship to the original.
Images & video
Include source regions, timestamps, sampled-frame intervals and legends. Describe enhancement as a transformation of a working copy.
Explore video analysis ↗Audio & voice
Link observations to recording intervals. Retain confidence flags in draft transcripts and distinguish voice similarity from a speaker conclusion.
Explore audio analysis ↗03 / REVIEW BEFORE RELEASE
Precision in the result.
Restraint in the claim.
An analytical score is one part of the record. The final report should also address evidence quality, conflicting findings and the limits of the chosen method.
Read the analysis & results notice →- Check the source
Review the original alongside outputs and confirm specimen references.
- Challenge the interpretation
Consider alternative explanations and the method’s failure modes.
- Record the limitations
State inconclusive outcomes and additional examination needed.
- Finalise the report
Record the report version, intended audience and release status.
Report structure and available exports vary by analysis. Confirm the required format and review process for your engagement; a report layout does not itself establish legal admissibility.
LET’S TALK ABOUT YOUR WORKFLOW
Make the report part of the plan.
Discuss the evidence types, intended audience and report requirements before examination begins.
FROM SOURCE TO OUTPUT
An exhibit with its source in view.
Follow the path from a document region, image feature or recording timestamp to a connected output.