Read the image history
Compare encoding families, inspect local statistical differences and screen for recapture traces.
3 image workflows ↗SPECIALIST IMAGE & VIDEO FORENSIC TOOLS
Explore specialist image and video forensic tools for encoding history, recapture indicators, local statistics, camera synchronisation and measured motion.
Six explained workflows from the Images and Video collections, brought together here with their inputs, outputs and technical coverage.
Compare JPEG settings with reference families. Read the consistency observations alongside file layout and metadata.
Select a feature or play the illustration.
01 / THE QUESTION DETERMINES THE METHOD
Follow the question across evidence types. Start with image structure, camera relationships or measurement requirements.
Compare encoding families, inspect local statistical differences and screen for recapture traces.
3 image workflows ↗Align cameras, inspect encoded motion decisions and estimate speed where timing and scale support it.
3 video workflows ↗02 / CAPABILITIES, EXPLAINED
Search six specialist workflows. Expand a card for required evidence, features, outputs and coverage, or continue to its full discipline page.
6 of 6 workflows
Compare stored JPEG compression settings with reference encoding families.
What you receive: Source-family consistency observations, supporting file-layout checks and reference-coverage information.
A JPEG image, with its claimed camera source or file history where available.
These patterns identify encoding families, not individual devices. Re-encoding may replace original settings; a matching family does not prove camera origin. Reference coverage is reported with the result.
Compare a suspected region’s compression response, noise and pixel statistics with surrounding areas.
What you receive: Diagnostic region maps, with calibrated flags only for the supported statistical map.
One questioned image; confirm format support before submission.
Texture, focus and compression can change these statistics. Other maps did not reliably separate planted splices in validation and are displayed without scores. A flag identifies a place to examine, not proof of alteration.
Look for image patterns consistent with photographing a display or printed image.
What you receive: Periodic-detail indicators with softness and tonal-range context.
One questioned photograph; confirm format support before submission.
Regular scene patterns can create similar peaks, and careful recapture may leave little trace. These are indicators for review, not a definitive screen-versus-camera or print-source verdict.
Put several recordings on a reference camera’s timeline using defensible anchors.
What you receive: Per-camera offsets, drift estimates, uncertainty and disagreement flags in a logged sync project.
Several camera recordings with suitable shared-frame, visible-clock or audio-event anchors.
A common timeline is an estimate with uncertainty, not an independently established capture clock. Weak correspondences are discarded; missing anchors are not guessed.
Estimate vehicle speed only after assessing the recording’s timing and source state.
What you receive: A full, indicative or refused timing status, method-specific estimates and uncertainty intervals where supportable.
Native footage with defensible timing and suitable geometry, road markings or examiner-confirmed device telemetry.
Some recordings cannot support a speed figure. Geometry, timing, reference assumptions and telemetry provenance must be defensible. Indicative estimates are not equivalent to a fully supported measurement.
Inspect the encoder’s recorded block and motion decisions across compatible footage.
What you receive: Motion fields, block-type and compression maps, per-frame statistics and supported static-region flags.
A compatible encoded video stream; coverage depends on the codec.
Other maps are displayed for examination without scores. Encoding choices, scene structure and camera motion affect interpretation. Coverage includes supported AVC and older MPEG streams; modern high-efficiency exports are not supported by this workflow.
Try another term or clear the filters to see all six workflows.
03 / TRADITIONAL + ASSISTED EXAMINATION
Replace repeated indexing and side-by-side calculations with structured diagnostics, linked references and recorded assumptions.
| Examination task | Traditional examination | With Admissible assistance |
|---|---|---|
| Source history | Inspect compression tables, metadata fields and file layout separately. | Compare against reference encoding families and keep the reference coverage with the observation. |
| Local differences | Compare suspected regions with their surroundings by visual inspection. | Generate local statistical maps, with thresholded flags only where the specific map supports them. |
| Camera timelines | Locate shared events and work out clock offsets across recordings. | Use documented anchors to estimate offsets and drift, retain uncertainty and flag conflicting methods. |
| Motion & speed | Inspect frames, establish scale and calculate distance over time. | Inspect encoded motion decisions; gate speed calculations on native timing, suitable geometry and uncertainty. |
| Time & cost | Spend working time on indexing, repeated comparisons and documentation. | Reduce repeatable setup and calculations where suitable. Input preparation, verification, reporting and fees remain part of the total. |
| Accuracy | Depends on source quality, timing, references and the validity of assumptions. | Adds repeatable observations and explicit uncertainty. Accuracy varies by workflow and validation coverage; no universal percentage uplift is claimed. |
Traditional examination may already use digital tools. This comparison describes workflow roles, not a claim that manual practice is inferior or that assisted outputs are automatically correct.
TIME & COST / YOUR OWN ESTIMATES
Enter the full effort for each approach: input preparation, reference selection, anchor setup, output checks and reporting. Include any additional assisted-workflow fees.
Time reduction and accuracy answer different questions. Check source resolution, reference-family coverage, codec support, timing quality and measurement uncertainty for the selected workflow.
Traditional: US$1,200 · Assisted: US$850
Example assumptions only. These are not measured platform savings, quoted fees or a performance guarantee.
04 / A TRACEABLE PROCESS
Preserve the source and make the reasoning traceable. Choose the analysis only after confirming the examination question and input requirements.
Keep the native file, its fingerprint and relevant source or recorder details.
Choose the required image format, codec, camera anchors, timing record or scale reference.
Retain reference-family coverage, actual frames examined, diagnostic maps and method-specific uncertainty.
Connect the result to its source, settings, assumptions and derived exhibits in the case record.
Purpose-specific processing. Documented outputs. Explore the analysis engine ↗
START WITH THE EVIDENCE YOU HAVE
Choose the specialist workflow that matches your evidence and examination question.