Request a demo ↗
ModulesAdditional tools

SPECIALIST IMAGE & VIDEO FORENSIC TOOLS

Specialist image
& video examination.

Explore specialist image and video forensic tools for encoding history, recapture indicators, local statistics, camera synchronisation and measured motion.

Six explained workflows from the Images and Video collections, brought together here with their inputs, outputs and technical coverage.

SPECIALIST FEATURE EXPLORERIllustrative only
Source informationLinked observations
Connected specialist workflowsA synthetic file diagram, region map, camera tracks and measurement geometry illustrate four analysis roles. No evidence is processed and no result is calculated. ENCODING HISTORY LOCAL IMAGE SIGNALS CAMERA ALIGNMENT MOTION & MEASUREMENT
A file has an encoding history.

Compare JPEG settings with reference families. Read the consistency observations alongside file layout and metadata.

No score or verdict generated

Select a feature or play the illustration.

6 explained workflowsThree image tools · three video tools
Linked to full detailsShared workflows, without double-counting capabilities
Structured outputsMaps, reference context & uncertainty

01 / THE QUESTION DETERMINES THE METHOD

What do you need
to examine?

Follow the question across evidence types. Start with image structure, camera relationships or measurement requirements.

01 / 3 IMAGE WORKFLOWS

Read the image history

Compare encoding families, inspect local statistical differences and screen for recapture traces.

3 image workflows ↗
02 / 3 VIDEO WORKFLOWS

Connect the recordings

Align cameras, inspect encoded motion decisions and estimate speed where timing and scale support it.

3 video workflows ↗

02 / CAPABILITIES, EXPLAINED

Specialist forensic tools.
A clear output.

Search six specialist workflows. Expand a card for required evidence, features, outputs and coverage, or continue to its full discipline page.

6 of 6 workflows

01 / IMAGE WORKFLOW

Compression-profile source screening

Compare stored JPEG compression settings with reference encoding families.

What you receive: Source-family consistency observations, supporting file-layout checks and reference-coverage information.

Inputs, features & limits
Required evidence

A JPEG image, with its claimed camera source or file history where available.

  • Compare compression-setting tables against known camera, editor, export-preset and sharing-platform references.
  • Cross-check other encoding tables, colour subsampling, thumbnails and metadata layout.
  • Compare those observations with the camera source claimed in embedded metadata.

These patterns identify encoding families, not individual devices. Re-encoding may replace original settings; a matching family does not prove camera origin. Reference coverage is reported with the result.

JPEG
Explore the full image workflow ↗
02 / IMAGE WORKFLOW

Local image-statistics maps

Compare a suspected region’s compression response, noise and pixel statistics with surrounding areas.

What you receive: Diagnostic region maps, with calibrated flags only for the supported statistical map.

Inputs, features & limits
Required evidence

One questioned image; confirm format support before submission.

  • Map local recompression differences, noise level, statistical texture and resampling periodicity.
  • Compare a suspected pasted object, replaced face or altered number plate with nearby material.
  • Apply a stated false-alarm threshold to the one supported region-flagging map; keep other maps unscored.

Texture, focus and compression can change these statistics. Other maps did not reliably separate planted splices in validation and are displayed without scores. A flag identifies a place to examine, not proof of alteration.

Explore the full image workflow ↗
03 / IMAGE WORKFLOW

Screen & print recapture indicators

Look for image patterns consistent with photographing a display or printed image.

What you receive: Periodic-detail indicators with softness and tonal-range context.

Inputs, features & limits
Required evidence

One questioned photograph; confirm format support before submission.

  • Inspect fine-detail periodicity that can arise from display pixels or print halftones.
  • Assess the strongest colour-channel signal while excluding JPEG-grid patterns and scene edges.
  • Read the indicators against thresholds established on authentic photographs, with softness and tonal context.

Regular scene patterns can create similar peaks, and careful recapture may leave little trace. These are indicators for review, not a definitive screen-versus-camera or print-source verdict.

Explore the full image workflow ↗
04 / VIDEO WORKFLOW

Multi-camera synchronisation

Put several recordings on a reference camera’s timeline using defensible anchors.

What you receive: Per-camera offsets, drift estimates, uncertainty and disagreement flags in a logged sync project.

Inputs, features & limits
Required evidence

Several camera recordings with suitable shared-frame, visible-clock or audio-event anchors.

  • Use shared events, examiner-transcribed on-screen clocks or sufficiently strong audio correspondences.
  • Estimate offsets and drift when anchors are far enough apart to support them.
  • Flag disagreeing methods rather than silently average incompatible estimates.
  • Keep unanchored cameras unsynchronised and fingerprint the history of anchor changes.

A common timeline is an estimate with uncertainty, not an independently established capture clock. Weak correspondences are discarded; missing anchors are not guessed.

Explore the full video workflow ↗
05 / VIDEO WORKFLOW

Speed estimation with uncertainty

Estimate vehicle speed only after assessing the recording’s timing and source state.

What you receive: A full, indicative or refused timing status, method-specific estimates and uncertainty intervals where supportable.

Inputs, features & limits
Required evidence

Native footage with defensible timing and suitable geometry, road markings or examiner-confirmed device telemetry.

  • Check native timing and re-encoding before deciding whether a speed estimate can be reported; refuse processed derivatives.
  • Use suitable positions between two marked frames, verified road-marking observations or confirmed device telemetry.
  • Cross-check independent approaches where the available evidence supports them.
  • Report worst-case bounds, probability-based intervals and the two-person sign-off state.

Some recordings cannot support a speed figure. Geometry, timing, reference assumptions and telemetry provenance must be defensible. Indicative estimates are not equivalent to a fully supported measurement.

Explore the full video workflow ↗
06 / VIDEO WORKFLOW

Encoded-frame & motion-data examination

Inspect the encoder’s recorded block and motion decisions across compatible footage.

What you receive: Motion fields, block-type and compression maps, per-frame statistics and supported static-region flags.

Inputs, features & limits
Required evidence

A compatible encoded video stream; coverage depends on the codec.

  • Read block-level decisions from the encoded stream and show sampled motion fields.
  • Display block-type, zero-motion, compression-setting and motion-discontinuity maps.
  • Flag a textured region that remains motionless while the surrounding camera view moves, only where the required frame type and camera motion are present.

Other maps are displayed for examination without scores. Encoding choices, scene structure and camera motion affect interpretation. Coverage includes supported AVC and older MPEG streams; modern high-efficiency exports are not supported by this workflow.

Explore the full video workflow ↗

03 / TRADITIONAL + ASSISTED EXAMINATION

Less repetitive work.
More room for scrutiny.

Replace repeated indexing and side-by-side calculations with structured diagnostics, linked references and recorded assumptions.

Examination taskTraditional examinationWith Admissible assistance
Source historyInspect compression tables, metadata fields and file layout separately.Compare against reference encoding families and keep the reference coverage with the observation.
Local differencesCompare suspected regions with their surroundings by visual inspection.Generate local statistical maps, with thresholded flags only where the specific map supports them.
Camera timelinesLocate shared events and work out clock offsets across recordings.Use documented anchors to estimate offsets and drift, retain uncertainty and flag conflicting methods.
Motion & speedInspect frames, establish scale and calculate distance over time.Inspect encoded motion decisions; gate speed calculations on native timing, suitable geometry and uncertainty.
Time & costSpend working time on indexing, repeated comparisons and documentation.Reduce repeatable setup and calculations where suitable. Input preparation, verification, reporting and fees remain part of the total.
AccuracyDepends on source quality, timing, references and the validity of assumptions.Adds repeatable observations and explicit uncertainty. Accuracy varies by workflow and validation coverage; no universal percentage uplift is claimed.

Traditional examination may already use digital tools. This comparison describes workflow roles, not a claim that manual practice is inferior or that assisted outputs are automatically correct.

TIME & COST / YOUR OWN ESTIMATES

Compare the full effort.

Enter the full effort for each approach: input preparation, reference selection, anchor setup, output checks and reporting. Include any additional assisted-workflow fees.

What about accuracy?

Time reduction and accuracy answer different questions. Check source resolution, reference-family coverage, codec support, timing quality and measurement uncertainty for the selected workflow.

Planning scenarioIllustrative, editable
Estimated time reduction3 hours
Estimated cost reductionUS$350

Traditional: US$1,200 · Assisted: US$850

Example assumptions only. These are not measured platform savings, quoted fees or a performance guarantee.

04 / A TRACEABLE PROCESS

From a focused question.
To a traceable output.

Preserve the source and make the reasoning traceable. Choose the analysis only after confirming the examination question and input requirements.

01 / PREPARE

Preserve the source

Keep the native file, its fingerprint and relevant source or recorder details.

02 / EXAMINE

Match the workflow

Choose the required image format, codec, camera anchors, timing record or scale reference.

03 / CHALLENGE

Record the coverage

Retain reference-family coverage, actual frames examined, diagnostic maps and method-specific uncertainty.

04 / REPORT

Keep outputs linked

Connect the result to its source, settings, assumptions and derived exhibits in the case record.

START WITH THE EVIDENCE YOU HAVE

Find the workflow that fits.

Choose the specialist workflow that matches your evidence and examination question.

Explore the six workflows ↑